from_multidimensional_java_arrays

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
from_multidimensional_java_arrays [2025/04/18 17:07]
colinr [sf00FromNestedStrings(Object data)]
from_multidimensional_java_arrays [2025/04/18 17:31] (current)
colinr
Line 1: Line 1:
-===== sf00FromNested(Object data) =====+====== Programmatically Creating Complex SecsFormat00 Objects from Java Arrays ====== 
 + 
 + 
 +===== 🧩 Convert Mixed-Type Nested Arrays: sf00FromNested(Object data) =====
  
 Recursively converts a nested ''Object'' array into a hierarchical SECS structure, inferring SECS types based on the Java type of each leaf element. Recursively converts a nested ''Object'' array into a hierarchical SECS structure, inferring SECS types based on the Java type of each leaf element.
  
 You may use this method when your structure may contain integers, floats, doubles, longs, or strings. Each array level becomes a ''SecsFormat00''. You may use this method when your structure may contain integers, floats, doubles, longs, or strings. Each array level becomes a ''SecsFormat00''.
-==== Example usage ==== 
  
-<code java> +==== Example method ====
-Object[][] example +
-    {"abc", 123, 1.23}, +
-    {"xyz", new Object[] { 456L, 7.89f }}, +
-}; +
- +
-SecsFormat00 result sf00FromNested(example); +
-</code> +
- +
-**Expected output:** +
- +
-<code> +
-[[<A 'abc'>, <I4 123>, <F8 1.23000>], [<A 'xyz'>, [<I8 456>, <F4 7.89000>]]] +
-</code>+
  
 <code java> <code java>
Line 57: Line 46:
 } }
 </code> </code>
- 
- 
-===== sf00FromNestedStrings(Object data) ===== 
- 
-Recursively converts a nested ''Object'' array into a SECS structure assuming all leaf elements are strings or nulls. This is often better when you know the expected SecsFormat of your values because the type can be defined explicitly. 
  
 ==== Example usage ==== ==== Example usage ====
  
 <code java> <code java>
-String[][][] nestedStrings = { +Object[][] example = { 
-    +    {"abc", 1231.23}, 
-        {"A", "B"}, +    {"xyz", new Object[] 456L7.89f }},
-        {"C", "D"+
-    }, +
-    +
-        {"E", "F"}, +
-        {"G""H"} +
-    }+
 }; };
  
-SecsFormat00 result = sf00FromNestedStrings(nestedStrings);+SecsFormat00 result = sf00FromNested(example);
 </code> </code>
  
Line 83: Line 61:
  
 <code> <code>
-[[[<A 'A'>, <A 'B'>][<A 'C'>, <A 'D'>]], [[<A 'E'>, <A 'F'>], [<A 'G'>, <A 'H'>]]]+[[<A 'abc'>, <I4 123>, <F8 1.23000>], [<A 'xyz'>, [<I8 456>, <F4 7.89000>]]]
 </code> </code>
 +
 +
 +===== 🔤 Convert All-String Nested Arrays: sf00FromNestedStrings(Object data) =====
 +
 +Recursively converts a nested ''Object'' array into a SECS structure assuming all leaf elements are strings or nulls. This is often better when you know the expected SecsFormat of your values because the type can be defined explicitly.
 +
 +==== Example method ====
  
 <code java> <code java>
Line 112: Line 97:
     return list;     return list;
 } }
 +</code>
 +
 +==== Example usage ====
 +
 +<code java>
 +String[][][] nestedStrings = {
 +    {
 +        {"A", "B"},
 +        {"C", "D"}
 +    },
 +    {
 +        {"E", "F"},
 +        {"G", "H"}
 +    }
 +};
 +
 +SecsFormat00 result = sf00FromNestedStrings(nestedStrings);
 +</code>
 +
 +**Expected output:**
 +
 +<code>
 +[[[<A 'A'>, <A 'B'>], [<A 'C'>, <A 'D'>]], [[<A 'E'>, <A 'F'>], [<A 'G'>, <A 'H'>]]]
 +</code>
 +
 +
 +===== 📦 Convert Structured Triple Arrays: sf00FromNestedStructuredTriple(Object data) =====
 +
 +Recursively converts a nested ''Object'' array into a hierarchical SECS structure, using explicit types at the leaf. In this example,  
 +Non-array elements are assumed to be leaf-level triples: **[String, Float, Integer]**.  
 +Arrays are recursively processed into nested ''SecsFormat00'' structures.
 +
 +==== Example method ====
 +
 +<code java>
 +/**
 + * Recursively converts a nested {@code Object} array into a hierarchical SECS structure.
 + * <p>
 + * Non-array elements are assumed to be leaf-level triples: [String, Float, Integer].
 + * Arrays are recursively processed into nested {@link SecsFormat00} structures.
 + *
 + * @param data the nested Object array
 + * @return a {@link SecsFormat00} representing the structured SECS data
 + * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the leaf triple is invalid or structure is malformed
 + */
 +public static SecsFormat00 sf00FromNestedStructuredTriple(Object data) {
 +    if (!(data instanceof Object[])) {
 +        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Input must be an Object[]");
 +    }
 +
 +    Object[] array = (Object[]) data;
 +
 +    // Check if this is a valid leaf triple
 +    if (array.length == 3 &&
 +            array[0] instanceof String &&
 +            array[1] instanceof Float &&
 +            array[2] instanceof Integer) {
 +
 +        SecsFormat00 triple = new SecsFormat00();
 +        triple.add(new SecsFormat20((String) array[0]));
 +        triple.add(new SecsFormat44((Float) array[1]));
 +        triple.add(new SecsFormat34((Integer) array[2]));
 +        return triple;
 +    }
 +
 +    // Otherwise, treat as nested structure
 +    SecsFormat00 list = new SecsFormat00();
 +    for (Object element : array) {
 +        if (!(element instanceof Object[])) {
 +            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Encountered non-array element where nested structure was expected");
 +        }
 +        list.add(sf00FromNestedStructuredTriple(element));
 +    }
 +
 +    return list;
 +}
 +</code>
 +
 +==== Example usage ====
 +
 +<code java>
 +Object[] nested = {
 +    new Object[] {
 +        new Object[] { "abc", 1.5f, 42 },
 +        new Object[] { "def", 2.5f, 99 }
 +    },
 +    new Object[] {
 +        new Object[] { "ghi", 3.0f, 7 }
 +    }
 +};
 +
 +SecsFormat00 result = sf00FromNestedStructuredTriple(nested);
 +</code>
 +
 +**Expected output:**
 +
 +<code>
 +[[[<A 'abc'>, <F4 1.50000>, <I4 42>], [<A 'def'>, <F4 2.50000>, <I4 99>]], [[<A 'ghi'>, <F4 3.00000>, <I4 7>]]]
 </code> </code>
  
  • from_multidimensional_java_arrays.1745014067.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/04/18 17:07
  • by colinr